{"id":2031,"date":"2022-04-21T15:10:06","date_gmt":"2022-04-21T13:10:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/uncategorized\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/"},"modified":"2022-05-31T18:24:48","modified_gmt":"2022-05-31T16:24:48","slug":"responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/","title":{"rendered":"Responsabilit\u00e9 de Google pour son service Google Adwords : contrefa\u00e7on de marques"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Depuis 2005, la position du TGI de Paris et celle des autres juges du fond dans les affaires Google Adwords se divergeaient en ce qui concerne la responsabilit\u00e9 de Google pour contrefa\u00e7on de marques. Face \u00e0 cette jurisprudence ind\u00e9cise, la Cour de cassation a saisi la CJUE en mai 2008 des questions pr\u00e9judicielles pour savoir si l\u2019usage fait par Google de mots clefs correspondant \u00e0 des marques \u00e9tait constitutif d\u2019une atteinte \u00e0 ces marques et si Google pouvait b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier du r\u00e9gime d\u2019exon\u00e9ration de responsabilit\u00e9 pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 l\u2019article 14 de la directive n\u00b0 2000\/31 du 8 juin 2000 au titre de sa qualit\u00e9 d\u2019h\u00e9bergeur. Dans un arr\u00eat de principe du 23 mars 2010, la CJUE a mis fin \u00e0 cette ins\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique. D\u00e9sormais, Google ne peut voir sa responsabilit\u00e9 engag\u00e9e \u00e0 titre de contrefacteur.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1745,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2031","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-case-law"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nResponsabilit\u00e9 de Google pour son service Google Adwords : contrefa\u00e7on de marques - Clare L\u00e9gal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Responsabilit\u00e9 de Google pour son service Google Adwords : contrefa\u00e7on de marques - Clare L\u00e9gal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Depuis 2005, la position du TGI de Paris et celle des autres juges du fond dans les affaires Google Adwords se divergeaient en ce qui concerne la responsabilit\u00e9 de Google pour contrefa\u00e7on de marques. Face \u00e0 cette jurisprudence ind\u00e9cise, la Cour de cassation a saisi la CJUE en mai 2008 des questions pr\u00e9judicielles pour savoir si l\u2019usage fait par Google de mots clefs correspondant \u00e0 des marques \u00e9tait constitutif d\u2019une atteinte \u00e0 ces marques et si Google pouvait b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier du r\u00e9gime d\u2019exon\u00e9ration de responsabilit\u00e9 pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 l\u2019article 14 de la directive n\u00b0 2000\/31 du 8 juin 2000 au titre de sa qualit\u00e9 d\u2019h\u00e9bergeur. Dans un arr\u00eat de principe du 23 mars 2010, la CJUE a mis fin \u00e0 cette ins\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique. D\u00e9sormais, Google ne peut voir sa responsabilit\u00e9 engag\u00e9e \u00e0 titre de contrefacteur.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Clare L\u00e9gal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-21T13:10:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-05-31T16:24:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/bloc-IP.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1374\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"936\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin@clarelegal.com\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin@clarelegal.com\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/\",\"name\":\"Responsabilit\u00e9 de Google pour son service Google Adwords : contrefa\u00e7on de marques - Clare L\u00e9gal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/bloc-IP.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-21T13:10:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-05-31T16:24:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/669e691140e3151c989ba772ac9cd192\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/bloc-IP.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/bloc-IP.jpg\",\"width\":1374,\"height\":936,\"caption\":\"Daniel Buren columns in Palais royal. Palais Royal square and palace located in Paris opposite the north wing of the Louvre. Usually busy and crowded, there are no people in the courtyard or on the Buren columns, during Covid19 lockdown in Paris. Paris in France, May 29, 2020\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Responsabilit\u00e9 de Google pour son service Google Adwords : contrefa\u00e7on de marques\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/\",\"name\":\"Clare L\u00e9gal\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/669e691140e3151c989ba772ac9cd192\",\"name\":\"admin@clarelegal.com\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bc6c834e9d88d0bd6e8e727e287c869fd299c721b75cf6d76cfc9d922779e4de?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bc6c834e9d88d0bd6e8e727e287c869fd299c721b75cf6d76cfc9d922779e4de?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin@clarelegal.com\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/author\/adminclarelegal-com\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Responsabilit\u00e9 de Google pour son service Google Adwords : contrefa\u00e7on de marques - Clare L\u00e9gal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Responsabilit\u00e9 de Google pour son service Google Adwords : contrefa\u00e7on de marques - Clare L\u00e9gal","og_description":"Depuis 2005, la position du TGI de Paris et celle des autres juges du fond dans les affaires Google Adwords se divergeaient en ce qui concerne la responsabilit\u00e9 de Google pour contrefa\u00e7on de marques. Face \u00e0 cette jurisprudence ind\u00e9cise, la Cour de cassation a saisi la CJUE en mai 2008 des questions pr\u00e9judicielles pour savoir si l\u2019usage fait par Google de mots clefs correspondant \u00e0 des marques \u00e9tait constitutif d\u2019une atteinte \u00e0 ces marques et si Google pouvait b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier du r\u00e9gime d\u2019exon\u00e9ration de responsabilit\u00e9 pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 l\u2019article 14 de la directive n\u00b0 2000\/31 du 8 juin 2000 au titre de sa qualit\u00e9 d\u2019h\u00e9bergeur. Dans un arr\u00eat de principe du 23 mars 2010, la CJUE a mis fin \u00e0 cette ins\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique. D\u00e9sormais, Google ne peut voir sa responsabilit\u00e9 engag\u00e9e \u00e0 titre de contrefacteur.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/","og_site_name":"Clare L\u00e9gal","article_published_time":"2022-04-21T13:10:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-05-31T16:24:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1374,"height":936,"url":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/bloc-IP.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin@clarelegal.com","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin@clarelegal.com"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/","url":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/","name":"Responsabilit\u00e9 de Google pour son service Google Adwords : contrefa\u00e7on de marques - Clare L\u00e9gal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/bloc-IP.jpg","datePublished":"2022-04-21T13:10:06+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-31T16:24:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/669e691140e3151c989ba772ac9cd192"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/bloc-IP.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/bloc-IP.jpg","width":1374,"height":936,"caption":"Daniel Buren columns in Palais royal. Palais Royal square and palace located in Paris opposite the north wing of the Louvre. Usually busy and crowded, there are no people in the courtyard or on the Buren columns, during Covid19 lockdown in Paris. Paris in France, May 29, 2020"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/case-law\/responsabilite-de-google-pour-son-service-google-adwords-contrefacon-de-marques\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Responsabilit\u00e9 de Google pour son service Google Adwords : contrefa\u00e7on de marques"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/","name":"Clare L\u00e9gal","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/669e691140e3151c989ba772ac9cd192","name":"admin@clarelegal.com","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bc6c834e9d88d0bd6e8e727e287c869fd299c721b75cf6d76cfc9d922779e4de?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bc6c834e9d88d0bd6e8e727e287c869fd299c721b75cf6d76cfc9d922779e4de?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin@clarelegal.com"},"url":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/author\/adminclarelegal-com\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2031","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2031"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2031\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2032,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2031\/revisions\/2032"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1745"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2031"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2031"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarelegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2031"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}